TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison – America Bomber vs Russia Bomber

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison

Here is the TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison, America Bomber vs Russia Bomber, During the Cold War, both the US and the Soviet Union maintained enormous fleets of strategic bombers. These massive planes were meant to strike land and naval targets with air-to-ground armament, torpedoes, and nuclear warheads.

Because the US B-52 Stratofortress and Russia’s Tu-95 are two of the world’s most long-serving aircraft, we thought it would be fun to compare their capabilities and see which one is superior.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

America Bomber vs Russia Bomber

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison OVERVIEW

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

B 52

The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is an American long-range jet-powered strategic bomber that has been in service with the United States Air Force since 1955. Its official name is Stratofortress, although it is more often known as buff. Despite the arrival of newer planes,

Because of its superior performance and cheap operating expenses, the B-52 remains in service. A total of 744 B-52s of all kinds have been produced to date. The aircraft is handled by a five-person crew and weighs 185 thousand pounds empty and 488 thousand pounds when fully loaded.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

Tu-95

The Tu-95, on the other hand, is regarded not only as a weapons platform but also as a symbol of Soviet and Russian national prestige. The tu-95 is a strategic bomber and missile platform with four turboprop engines. The aircraft’s NATO reporting name is bare. The tu-95 is one of the world’s fastest propeller planes, capable of reaching speeds of over 500 mph.

The aircraft joined the Soviet air force in 1956 and is projected to remain in service with the Russian air force until 2040. More than 500 tu-95s have been manufactured so far, and the aircraft requires a crew of six to seven persons to operate. The Tu-95 has an empty weight of 198 16 pounds and can lift up to 414 469 pounds.

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison PERFORMANCE

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

The aircraft’s top speed is 650 miles per hour, and it can cruise at 509 miles per hour with a ferry range of 10 145 miles. It is powered by eight Pratt and Whitney turbofan engines that produce a combined 136 thousand pounds of torque. The aircraft has a fighting radius of 8,800 miles. The jet has a maximum height of 50 000 feet and can climb at a pace of 6270 feet per minute. The plane can carry up to 70 thousand pounds of the mixed ordinance in various combinations.

The b-52 was also equipped with a remote-controlled 20-millimeter cannon, which was removed from all operational aircraft in 1991. The bear, on the other hand, is propelled by only four turboprop engines that can provide 60 000 pounds of thrust when combined.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

However, the aircraft can still reach a top speed of 575 miles per hour and cruise at 441 miles per hour, with a maximum range of 9300 miles. Within a radius of 3977 miles, the bear can perform combat activities. The aircraft has a maximum altitude of 45 000 feet and can rise at a pace of 2000 feet per minute. The Tu-95 can carry a 33,500-pound payload of a variety of weaponry. The aircraft’s tail turret is armed with two 23-millimeter guns.

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison MISSION SETS

The B-52 was built to carry nuclear weapons for deterrence operations during the Cold War. During that time, several squadrons of b-52 aircraft armed with nuclear bombs were kept in the air 24 hours a day. However, the b-52 has only dropped conventional munitions in combat thus far.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

The Tu-95 was originally meant to carry out nuclear strikes, but it has since been adapted to undertake a variety of tasks including cruise missile deployment, maritime patrol, early warning operations, and even conversion into a civilian airliner.

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison RADAR and AVIONICS

To tackle persistent threats, the B-52 has been modernized with the newest avionics software and armament systems over time. Raytheon’s APG-79 and APG-82 active electronically scanned array radars are the basis for the new active electronically scanned array radar. For a higher level of situational awareness, the radar has improved navigation accuracy, high-resolution mapping, and target recognition and tracking. The B-52 is upgraded with infrared flare dispensers and shaft dispensers, as well as a new computer architecture linking 16 tactical data links, and an improved wideband interface.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

The B-52 will be operational until 2050 and beyond thanks to new radar and avionics upgrading initiatives. Similarly, the Russian Tu-95 has been modernized with cutting-edge weaponry, avionics, and engines. The aircraft has a sophisticated radar system that can track both surface and air threats.

The aircraft is equipped with dedicated sensors for weather navigation and gunfire control, as well as an infrared information display system and the meteor airborne defense complex. To counter approaching radar-guided missiles, the bear is equipped with electronic countermeasures pods and a terrain bounce jammer. The tu-95 also has decoy dispensers for chaff and flares.

TU 95 vs B 52 Comparison FIREPOWER

The b-52 can be outfitted with a wide range of armaments thanks to its seventy thousand pounds of weapons payload. While the b-52 is no longer required to carry nuclear bombs, it does have the capability to carry 12 nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. Twenty cruise missiles and eight nuclear bombs are launched from the air.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

Nowadays, most airplanes are armed with standard armaments such as harpoon missiles. missiles called raptors cruise missiles launched from normal aircraft weaponry for joint standoff Wind-corrected munitions distributor weapons and joint direct attack munitions The plane is equipped with cutting-edge smart armaments such as combined air-to-surface standoff missiles. Boost phase interceptors and small diameter weapons on rotary launchers This beast can also deploy up to 300,000 pounds of navy mines thanks to its lightning laser targeting pod.

The tu-95, on the other hand, can carry 33,500 pounds of weapons payload in various combinations of missiles and munitions. The aircraft has a large armament compartment in the middle that can hold six kh-55 nuclear-armed long-range cruise missiles. With a range of up to miles, the kh-55 is available in both conventional and nuclear warheads. An air-launched cruise missile with a thermonuclear warhead can also be installed on the aircraft.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

The aircraft can carry a variety of guided and unguided weapons, as well as anti-ship missiles and conventionally equipped air launch cruise missiles. The rear turret box houses a twin-barreled cannon. Though both aircraft are aesthetically identical, it is the degree of their technology that distinguishes them. The b-52’s service life has been prolonged by the United States, which has spent a significant amount of money on improvements over the years. The tu-95 has also undergone upgrades.

However, the B-52 has been upgraded with all-new engines, cockpits, and avionics. These improvements improve the b-52’s weight carrying capacity, top speed, range climb rate, and service ceiling. Both aircraft are incredibly loud, but the bear’s coaxial propeller blades make it one of the loudest military aircraft. The bear also has a larger radar cross-section, however the b-52 struggles in this area.

TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison
TU-95-vs-B-52-Comparison

However, in today’s age and time, stealth isn’t everything for these massive aircraft; their huge payload and extended range allow them to carry a variety of modern armaments such as cruise missiles, precision-guided weapons, and air to surface missiles. The bomber’s electronic warfare systems countermeasures and fighter jet escorts, paired with the enhanced cruise missile ranges, assure that these two legendary bombers will continue to serve their respective countries into the 2050s or longer.

NEXT
 BBC 
Top 10 Military Trucks in the World
Top 10 Swing Wing Aircraft

Leave a Comment

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap