F-35 vs SU-57 Comparison
These fifth-generation fighters are armed with cutting-edge technology and are created with diverse skills in mind. They can penetrate enemy airspace and destroy air Defences before a conventional battle begins. Today, we’ll compare two stealth aircraft of varying calibers: the US F-35 and Russia’s SU-57, with the goal of determining which aircraft would win in a one-on-one battle. and we will tell you the difference between f-22 and f-35 jets.
F-35 vs SU-57 Full Comparison
1. F-35 vs SU-57 OVERVIEW
The F-35 is a multi-purpose fighter jet designed to carry out strike missions. There are three versions of the F-35.
All have varied duties, but we’ll focus on the F-35A base type, which was built particularly for the Air Force. In 2016, the F-35a was introduced. More than 690 aircraft have been manufactured to far, with an average unit cost of 80 million dollars.
The SU-57, on the other hand, is a fifth-generation air superiority aircraft designed to eliminate all forms of air, ground, and marine targets. Sahoy has created ten prototypes and two serial units as of now. The Russian Defense Ministry intends to purchase a total of 76 aircraft for the Russian Air Force. Although the per-unit cost of the aircraft has not been released, some Russian Defence analysts predict that a single unit, excluding r d costs, will cost roughly 40 to 50 million dollars.
2. F-35 vs SU-57 Design and Stealth
F-35 Design and Stealth
The f-35 is 51.4 feet in length and 14.4 feet in height, with a 35-foot wingspan. The jet is coated with radar absorbent materials and the engine face is camouflaged to reduce the aircraft’s rcs to less than a golf ball. The f-35’s radar-absorbing skin is even more robust than the f-22’s. To further confound enemy radar, the F-35’s stealth design focuses on high-frequency x-band wavelengths. The jet can also be equipped with Luneburg lens reflectors.
SU-57 Design and Stealth
The Su-57, on the other hand, is a larger plane, measuring 66 feet in length and 15 feet in height, with a 46-foot wingspan. Instead of being an all-aspect stealth aircraft, the Su-57 focuses on frontal stealth. To lower the rcs, the jet’s airframe was developed with finer edge alignments. The engine inlets are built with radar-absorbent angled ducts, and the aircraft is coated with radar-absorbent material. Due to the substantial use of composite materials, the fighter jet weighs four times less than the Su-27. The RCS of the SU-57 range from one to eleven square feet.
3. F-35 vs SU-57 Performance
The f-35 is powered by a single Pratt and Whitney engine that produces 43 000 pounds of thrust. This engine allows the plane to fly vertically into the sky and reach a top speed of Mach 1.6. The aircraft has a maximum range of 1700 miles and can operate within a 770-mile radius for combat operations. The f-35 can reach a maximum height of 50,000 feet by climbing at a pace of 45 000 feet per minute.
The Russian aircraft, on the other hand, is propelled by a pair of afterburning turbofan engines that produce 64 000 pounds of thrust each and can propel the aircraft to a top speed of Mach 2. The fighter jet’s maximum range on internal fuel is 2175 miles, and its battle radius is unknown, however some defence analysts estimate it to be approximately 750 miles. The Su-57 can rise to a maximum height of 66,000 feet at a rate of 70 800 feet per minute.
4. F-35 vs SU-57 Maneuverability
The aircraft can fly at a relatively modest pace of 115 miles per hour with the jet’s nose pitched up 50 degrees, according to the F-35 manufacturer. The jet can undertake a high angle of attack maneuvers, and the immediate and sustained turn rates are now better than traditional fighter jets. Even post-stall maneuvers are possible with the flight control system. An f-35 pilot can also swiftly enter within an enemy’s turning circle due to the aircraft’s mobility.
Su-57, on the other hand, can conduct maneuvers with extremely high angles of attack, such as Pugachev’s cobra bell maneuver and flat rotations. Su-57 can outmaneuver f-35 in every potential situation in a conventional duel with its flight control system and thrust vectoring nozzles, which literally defy the rules of physics.
5. F-35 vs SU-57 Radar and Avionics
F-35 Radar and Avionics
5th position The f-35 has the latest APG-81 radar, which can monitor 23 targets in nine seconds and engage 19 of them in 2.4 seconds. The radar’s range is unknown, although some defence analysts say it can identify an 11 square foot target from 250 to 300 miles away.
The F-35’s capacity to comprehend the battle zone is unparalleled; the plane is practically packed with sensors. The sensor fusion on the aircraft creates a real-time picture of the battlefield that is fed to surrounding allied troops. The US army and air force have previously experimented guiding long-range artillery fire with the F-35 sensors.
SU-57 Radar and Avionics
Meanwhile, the Su-57 is equipped with an ESA radar capable of detecting and tracking in the face of electronic countermeasures. The aircraft can even detect hostile stealth aircraft using the x and l-band modes. The radar’s estimated range to detect an 11 square foot target is roughly 249 miles.
The Su-57 is equipped with cutting-edge avionics, including high-level automation and intelligent crew assistance. The integrated avionics suite can automatically detect, identify, and track the most deadly targets, providing the pilot with the best possible solution. The aircraft can also communicate real-time battlefield data with pier aircraft and ground units.
6. F-35 vs SU-57 Firepower
sixth place The F-35 has two internal weapon bays with four weapon stations each, as well as six external hardpoints. Air-to-air missiles are carried by the two inboard weapon stations, while air-to-surface weaponry is carried by the two outboard weapon stations. The f-35a is equipped with a 25mm rotary gun that holds 182 rounds.
The Su-57, on the other hand, has two primary internal armament bays for air-to-air combat. For longer-range engagements, the SU-57 is equipped with four BVR missiles and two short-range missiles. The plane is equipped with four BVR missiles with a range of more than 186 miles. Long-range hypersonic r-37m missiles with a Mach 6 speed can be carried by aircraft. Air-to-surface ordnance can also be carried by aircraft. The internal 30mm auto gun can fire 1800 rounds per minute. In the future, the Su-57 will be armed with the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile and will be able to manage swarms of combat drones for surveillance or electronic warfare.
7. F-35 vs SU-57 isolated dogfights
Any future engagement between the F-35 and the Su-57 will almost certainly take place in the presence of air defence systems, electronic warfare, and support infrastructure. If these aircraft are engaged in isolation, the f-35 should attempt to detect and destroy the Su-57 first. If the Russian jet detects the f-35 first, the f-35 will be doomed because it cannot win a one-on-one dogfight due to the Su-57’s superior maneuverability.
The fundamental flaw of the Su-57, on the other hand, is its lack of radar visibility, although there is still no accurate information regarding the reflective surface of both the F-35 and the Su-57. So, which fighter plane do you think is better, the US F-35 or Russia’s Su-57? Let us know in the comments area.